Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-26 04:51:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E5DB081040DE0B1CBC030A073B300D089B6643F28AEC172AA7F597E9D024A95
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ipsos a fait un communiqué rectifiant l'erreur. L'échantillon représentatif est bien sélectionné dans la population parisienne inscrite sur les listes électorales https://twitter.com/IpsosFrance/status/1771933305782272011?t=MAWE-m31rQwdhkNVBgkGfg&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772179585599193411
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E5DB081040DE0B1CBC030A073B300D089B6643F28AEC172AA7F597E9D024A95
  • createdAtMillis - 1711428703041
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17721795855991934115E5DB081040DE0B1CBC030A073B300D089B6643F28AEC172AA7F597E9D024A95