Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 15:57:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BA8E6637835D286E334BF1D88950738BBDC13CAA3EBFCFECA2495DFF7B2C2149
Participant Details

Original Note:

Missing important context: Dr Kaur Gill filed defamation suits against 23 of her critics in an attempt to silence them. They were thrown out as vexatious (SLAPP), & as a result she is responsible for $1.1MCAD in legal costs for the defendants. She recently lost her appeal. https://www.lawtimesnews.com/practice-areas/litigation/covid-vaccine-skeptic-doctor-loses-anti-slapp-case-at-court-of-appeal/384083

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772108563969695859
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BA8E6637835D286E334BF1D88950738BBDC13CAA3EBFCFECA2495DFF7B2C2149
  • createdAtMillis - 1711382249540
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772108563969695859BA8E6637835D286E334BF1D88950738BBDC13CAA3EBFCFECA2495DFF7B2C2149