Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 19:07:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F072C7D50AD16CC78192A6927A4717C550E70C9B0BBDCA99BF46D2389F55AA6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Context required: The man was not fined for covering up his face, but given a £90 public order fine for swearing at police officers who confronted him. There's no UK law which requires facial recognition. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/facial-recognition-cameras-technology-london-trial-met-police-face-cover-man-fined-a8756936.html https://homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk/2023/10/29/police-use-of-facial-recognition-factsheet/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771903144051773729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F072C7D50AD16CC78192A6927A4717C550E70C9B0BBDCA99BF46D2389F55AA6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1711307247752
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771903144051773729F072C7D50AD16CC78192A6927A4717C550E70C9B0BBDCA99BF46D2389F55AA6E