Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 13:54:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9525928082DC2EB5E63E98B1119DDD4253DEB5B7596501B647C1E713D65D535
Participant Details

Original Note:

Physical characteristics are not binary and the width of pelvises is not an accurate indicator of biological sex. Furthermore, biological sex and gender identity are not synonymous. This is the consensus of actual scientists and the contrary is purely transphobia. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.336G8HA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771888217614119195
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9525928082DC2EB5E63E98B1119DDD4253DEB5B7596501B647C1E713D65D535
  • createdAtMillis - 1711288474092
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771888217614119195A9525928082DC2EB5E63E98B1119DDD4253DEB5B7596501B647C1E713D65D535