Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 15:59:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F80A2AF3F1E210D3F4518B473ED4037FADB5FF5B8CCDD379BD8D5ABC2EEE269
Participant Details

Original Note:

Physical characteristics are not binary and the width of pelvises is not an accurate indicator of biological sex. Furthermore, biological sex and gender identity are not synonymous. This is the consensus of actual scientists and the contrary is purely transphobia. https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.336G8HA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771888217614119195
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F80A2AF3F1E210D3F4518B473ED4037FADB5FF5B8CCDD379BD8D5ABC2EEE269
  • createdAtMillis - 1711295981548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17718882176141191953F80A2AF3F1E210D3F4518B473ED4037FADB5FF5B8CCDD379BD8D5ABC2EEE269