Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 05:44:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F2D0E92CC54EA3C9A38F7D2996485E50C9A000AE7A17883E266E4981C269E14
Participant Details

Original Note:

The 2015 study this article is based on was retracted 5 years ago. https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(19)30875-9.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771677651263971448
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F2D0E92CC54EA3C9A38F7D2996485E50C9A000AE7A17883E266E4981C269E14
  • createdAtMillis - 1711259050639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17716776512639714489F2D0E92CC54EA3C9A38F7D2996485E50C9A000AE7A17883E266E4981C269E14