Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 23:06:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED0FB0E14673F610ED701BBC02167442CF3CE0D92FBFDAB6DD3F02A12DF78A8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

År 2010 beslutades i riksdagen efter folkomröstningen. Denna post är missvisande då alla 3 alternativ i omröstningen innebar att kärnkraften avvecklades, bara i olika takt, vilket har ifrågasatts ur ett demokratiskt perspektiv. Se: https://sv.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%A4rnkraftsfr%C3%A5gan_i_Sverige

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771647611486773462
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED0FB0E14673F610ED701BBC02167442CF3CE0D92FBFDAB6DD3F02A12DF78A8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1711235216530
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1771647611486773462ED0FB0E14673F610ED701BBC02167442CF3CE0D92FBFDAB6DD3F02A12DF78A8C