Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 21:23:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

O estudo citado pela nota diz "estudo NÃO prova relação". Ausência de evidência não é evidência de ausência. E em relação ao segundo ponto, está implicito que o autor do post fala sobre a vacina contra COVID. NNN, já que é uma opinião pessoal sobre um tópico controverso.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771628626363957416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1711229019626
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17716286263639574167A3875F0E11E4667F597778227EA0E5A97034B1CBCBBEE6251CD4CFC26D3B2EC