Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 20:51:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 233A8A5702D09CF45AE98A3FA6CD2D3A489450D8B4EB89866BEEFFDBA73BD1B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

O estudo citado pela nota diz "estudo NÃO prova relação". Ausência de evidência não é evidência de ausência. E em relação ao segundo ponto, está implicito que o autor do post fala sobre a vacina contra COVID. NNN, já que é uma opinião pessoal sobre um tópico controverso.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771628626363957416
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 233A8A5702D09CF45AE98A3FA6CD2D3A489450D8B4EB89866BEEFFDBA73BD1B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1711227065298
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771628626363957416233A8A5702D09CF45AE98A3FA6CD2D3A489450D8B4EB89866BEEFFDBA73BD1B8