Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 00:21:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8916ABEDF26FBBDF3BC853E68C7D3E2A6430454A1EA2C2EEACA83B4400A174CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

La lecture rapide n'est pas validée par l'expérimentation scientifique, aucune donnée ne permet d'établir un bénéfice réel de la lecture rapide. Au contraire, l'inefficacité de certaines de ces méthodes est démontrée. Elle est considérée comme une pseudoscience. https://www.cairn.info/psychologie-pour-l-enseignant--9782100533725.htm https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/actualites/psychologie-enquete-dit-science-lecture-rapide-86815/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771626637357948994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8916ABEDF26FBBDF3BC853E68C7D3E2A6430454A1EA2C2EEACA83B4400A174CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1711239685857
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17716266373579489948916ABEDF26FBBDF3BC853E68C7D3E2A6430454A1EA2C2EEACA83B4400A174CF