Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 21:33:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 646B539C838D2076648DBB54182BA38A286FFA6C155D9445F06DB87132793526
Participant Details

Original Note:

La lecture rapide n'est pas validée par l'expérimentation scientifique, aucune donnée ne permet d'établir un bénéfice réel de la lecture rapide. Au contraire, l'inefficacité de certaines de ces méthodes est démontrée. Elle est considérée comme une pseudoscience. https://www.cairn.info/psychologie-pour-l-enseignant--9782100533725.htm https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/actualites/psychologie-enquete-dit-science-lecture-rapide-86815/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771626637357948994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 646B539C838D2076648DBB54182BA38A286FFA6C155D9445F06DB87132793526
  • createdAtMillis - 1711229600031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771626637357948994646B539C838D2076648DBB54182BA38A286FFA6C155D9445F06DB87132793526