Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 23:03:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ADA0B503223F6362D28A29F5C2568510242515321FB9A018C15E7AD332AAFD7
Participant Details

Original Note:

La lecture rapide n'est pas validée par l'expérimentation scientifique, aucune donnée ne permet d'établir un bénéfice réel de la lecture rapide. Au contraire, l'inefficacité de certaines de ces méthodes est démontrée. Elle est considérée comme une pseudoscience. https://www.cairn.info/psychologie-pour-l-enseignant--9782100533725.htm https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/actualites/psychologie-enquete-dit-science-lecture-rapide-86815/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771626637357948994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1ADA0B503223F6362D28A29F5C2568510242515321FB9A018C15E7AD332AAFD7
  • createdAtMillis - 1711235024186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17716266373579489941ADA0B503223F6362D28A29F5C2568510242515321FB9A018C15E7AD332AAFD7