Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 20:10:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C01110826E4F06552879D0B5BFB37F60192D07D6A16F32D91E92306673D9250A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is addressing the claim that barristers cannot refuse cases based on the identity of the client, which it correctly states they cannot. Obviously lack of expertise or conflict of interest are exceptions to this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771589835829936215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C01110826E4F06552879D0B5BFB37F60192D07D6A16F32D91E92306673D9250A
  • createdAtMillis - 1711224639269
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771589835829936215C01110826E4F06552879D0B5BFB37F60192D07D6A16F32D91E92306673D9250A