Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 07:52:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 738EFB537DC2C04F87471020D73C10EB5D33604722144336121D0BA89F998A02
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is addressing the claim that barristers cannot refuse cases based on the identity of the client, which it correctly states they cannot. Obviously lack of expertise or conflict of interest are exceptions to this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771589835829936215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 738EFB537DC2C04F87471020D73C10EB5D33604722144336121D0BA89F998A02
  • createdAtMillis - 1711266756276
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771589835829936215738EFB537DC2C04F87471020D73C10EB5D33604722144336121D0BA89F998A02