Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 20:49:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60AE5DAD6643ABB2BBF11EA9E0099B61AE95F05D6C457E4A2B7DF7AE4FD26040
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is addressing the claim that barristers cannot refuse cases based on the identity of the client, which it correctly states they cannot. Obviously lack of expertise or conflict of interest are exceptions to this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771589835829936215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60AE5DAD6643ABB2BBF11EA9E0099B61AE95F05D6C457E4A2B7DF7AE4FD26040
  • createdAtMillis - 1711226985146
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177158983582993621560AE5DAD6643ABB2BBF11EA9E0099B61AE95F05D6C457E4A2B7DF7AE4FD26040