Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 08:08:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 492F43DD6C7672A316EECE481B9B68976EF8F20727205AB75F7993E6A08D5BF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is addressing the claim that barristers cannot refuse cases based on the identity of the client, which it correctly states they cannot. Obviously lack of expertise or conflict of interest are exceptions to this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771589835829936215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 492F43DD6C7672A316EECE481B9B68976EF8F20727205AB75F7993E6A08D5BF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1711267685044
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771589835829936215492F43DD6C7672A316EECE481B9B68976EF8F20727205AB75F7993E6A08D5BF9