Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 17:30:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F5F38C68D428E5D714B6BAA97802B2F765AEB2843EB2B0CF80ABE14DE0CD658
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is addressing the claim that barristers cannot refuse cases based on the identity of the client, which it correctly states they cannot. Obviously lack of expertise or conflict of interest are exceptions to this.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771589835829936215
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F5F38C68D428E5D714B6BAA97802B2F765AEB2843EB2B0CF80ABE14DE0CD658
  • createdAtMillis - 1711215026987
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17715898358299362153F5F38C68D428E5D714B6BAA97802B2F765AEB2843EB2B0CF80ABE14DE0CD658