Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 08:11:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D98D9770331C88EE05D67372941E12E505A7BCE3810008849631C23CAAF83CF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quelques exemples singuliers ne concluent pas à une généralité. La Direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes (DGCCRF) a conclu que la taxe rose n'existe pas : https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/PDF/rapport_parlement_woman-tax.pdf Un résultat corroboré dans d'autres pays comme les Etats-Unis : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351509443_Beyond_the_Pink_Tax_Gender-Based_Pricing_and_Differentiation_of_Personal_Care_Products

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771588317164843445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D98D9770331C88EE05D67372941E12E505A7BCE3810008849631C23CAAF83CF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1711267877655
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771588317164843445D98D9770331C88EE05D67372941E12E505A7BCE3810008849631C23CAAF83CF5