Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-24 08:58:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 077807E87AE3697A793174F60D2385DAFF98EC9C8EC6359F9AE9980D001DF491
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quelques exemples singuliers ne concluent pas à une généralité. La Direction générale de la concurrence, de la consommation et de la répression des fraudes (DGCCRF) a conclu que la taxe rose n'existe pas : https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/PDF/rapport_parlement_woman-tax.pdf Un résultat corroboré dans d'autres pays comme les Etats-Unis : https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351509443_Beyond_the_Pink_Tax_Gender-Based_Pricing_and_Differentiation_of_Personal_Care_Products

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771588317164843445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 077807E87AE3697A793174F60D2385DAFF98EC9C8EC6359F9AE9980D001DF491
  • createdAtMillis - 1711270696238
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771588317164843445077807E87AE3697A793174F60D2385DAFF98EC9C8EC6359F9AE9980D001DF491