Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 17:19:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D07C2718B67DA88824A466CDC31BDD2FF6C56A2F6675A5AF5831EC736FE7C77
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note doesn’t actually contradict the post. Yes, there are specific circumstances where a barrister is *not* required to take on the case. The original post is about rejecting a case “because the client is unpopular”, and is factually accurate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771580941640581191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D07C2718B67DA88824A466CDC31BDD2FF6C56A2F6675A5AF5831EC736FE7C77
  • createdAtMillis - 1711214372814
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17715809416405811913D07C2718B67DA88824A466CDC31BDD2FF6C56A2F6675A5AF5831EC736FE7C77