Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 19:40:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0CD6FD223B115AD06F1E486050034C55FCD43371CB8CF9EF7C063BA4F45A4F7
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no consensus on the "pink for girls blue for boys" statement among historians. In several instances throughout history the opposite was true. https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/12/health/colorscope-pink-boy-girl-gender/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771420191303283067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0CD6FD223B115AD06F1E486050034C55FCD43371CB8CF9EF7C063BA4F45A4F7
  • createdAtMillis - 1711222804526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771420191303283067F0CD6FD223B115AD06F1E486050034C55FCD43371CB8CF9EF7C063BA4F45A4F7