Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 08:37:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91146842DE1E0B692B6B7EBAD0A8DB1442E586D0242916D4934EDE29A9360F76
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no consensus on the "pink for girls blue for boys" statement among historians. In several instances throughout history the opposite was true. https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/12/health/colorscope-pink-boy-girl-gender/index.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771420191303283067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91146842DE1E0B692B6B7EBAD0A8DB1442E586D0242916D4934EDE29A9360F76
  • createdAtMillis - 1711183068876
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177142019130328306791146842DE1E0B692B6B7EBAD0A8DB1442E586D0242916D4934EDE29A9360F76