Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 04:34:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC10CC5D1B064DD79492E9813D1DA15149A99FD2C57626AD245BA823A32E64D8
Participant Details

Original Note:

画像内のワクチンと不妊の関連をほのめかす主張に関してですが客観的記録に基づくメタ解析(以下の引用文献全部同じで客観的記録に基づくメタ解析です)によるとコロナワクチンが不妊性や生殖関連指標の変化と関係はみられていません↓ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22011185?casa_token=SYTMnKo1Ck4AAAAA:EPxUEcrGILzCTdPB-Jm-_UDQw_sw1HutmDgRJBkpkJTjPt-dAbqXi7jjpukPMCHnTk38TDpiafo 一方で新型コロナには非常に顕著な妊婦へのリスクがあった事が判明しており↓ https://www.cmaj.ca/content/193/16/E540.short 未接種者は有意に高い流産・死産リスクの上昇があった事↓ https://academic.oup.com/trstmh/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/trstmh/trad093/7517742?login=false 接種の妊娠出産関連有害事象のリスクの上昇は見られない事が報告されている事に注意が必要です↓ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655322006241

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771383905901564257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC10CC5D1B064DD79492E9813D1DA15149A99FD2C57626AD245BA823A32E64D8
  • createdAtMillis - 1711168497595
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771383905901564257EC10CC5D1B064DD79492E9813D1DA15149A99FD2C57626AD245BA823A32E64D8