Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 17:52:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2C86A1779CE7018018978902FA63BAFE6427E6670C4A29D3226263271879BB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The bad legal take is the claim that the post quoted by TRHLOfficial constitutes incitement such that it would be unprotected. As laid out in Brandenburg v Ohio, there is a requirement that the lawless action be “imminent”, which is clearly not satisfied by a post like this https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771339423893860735
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2C86A1779CE7018018978902FA63BAFE6427E6670C4A29D3226263271879BB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1711216338169
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771339423893860735E2C86A1779CE7018018978902FA63BAFE6427E6670C4A29D3226263271879BB2