Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-03-23 02:16:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E217A2BAE25775CAC0C9736985E4C71C701A0C647ED1F8FBA192F2B219091D03
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN The bad legal take is the claim that the post quoted by TRHLOfficial constitutes incitement such that it would be unprotected. As laid out in Brandenburg v Ohio, there is a requirement that the lawless action be “imminent”, which is clearly not satisfied by a post like this https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/
All Note Details