Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 05:47:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4E2BEBDE222B63A69FCA030C2FD5BA2206003E3C0151BF9BC584284EB669B9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The bad legal take is the claim that the post quoted by TRHLOfficial constitutes incitement such that it would be unprotected. As laid out in Brandenburg v Ohio, there is a requirement that the lawless action be “imminent”, which is clearly not satisfied by a post like this https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771339423893860735
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4E2BEBDE222B63A69FCA030C2FD5BA2206003E3C0151BF9BC584284EB669B9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1711172850491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771339423893860735D4E2BEBDE222B63A69FCA030C2FD5BA2206003E3C0151BF9BC584284EB669B9A