Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 03:05:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EA4CC07C8569454C152578587173FBC34550ECA86803E51883CCB8CB320BBDB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The bad legal take is the claim that the post quoted by TRHLOfficial constitutes incitement such that it would be unprotected. As laid out in Brandenburg v Ohio, there is a requirement that the lawless action be “imminent”, which is clearly not satisfied by a post like this https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771339423893860735
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EA4CC07C8569454C152578587173FBC34550ECA86803E51883CCB8CB320BBDB
  • createdAtMillis - 1711163131005
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17713394238938607350EA4CC07C8569454C152578587173FBC34550ECA86803E51883CCB8CB320BBDB