Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 05:13:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B08A8C8FA9F7D7609C65E27D044CAC08013CDBA0F897D2DCB6F69D2E69E8FEA
Participant Details

Original Note:

C'est faux. CheckNews reprend point par point les nombreuses erreurs commises (notamment dans les chiffres) lors de la création de ce graphique : https://twitter.com/CheckNewsfr/status/1771218580769513924

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771223768347623487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B08A8C8FA9F7D7609C65E27D044CAC08013CDBA0F897D2DCB6F69D2E69E8FEA
  • createdAtMillis - 1711170807840
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17712237683476234870B08A8C8FA9F7D7609C65E27D044CAC08013CDBA0F897D2DCB6F69D2E69E8FEA