Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 17:50:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9A9F6E6F02B47E81CBE8B274DA875EBDEE4B63EAE3E026FA240DD7C4DD850E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is an assertion of a theory, and is not a fact. It has been debunked several times as it is considered revisionist history and ignores key reports, findings, and evidence stating otherwise. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pearl-Harbor-and-the-Back-Door-to-War-Theory-1688287

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771210441437393251
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9A9F6E6F02B47E81CBE8B274DA875EBDEE4B63EAE3E026FA240DD7C4DD850E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1711129848604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771210441437393251E9A9F6E6F02B47E81CBE8B274DA875EBDEE4B63EAE3E026FA240DD7C4DD850E3