Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 15:52:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post factually indicates what the FT article claims and how it determined that, and discusses reactions to it. It can’t be expected to repeat every possible caveat and reservation about the claim. Criticisms of the FT’s methods and conclusions belong in replies. https://www.ft.com/content/98f15b60-bc4d-4d3c-9e57-cbdde122ac0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771181258959167715
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE
  • createdAtMillis - 1711122768365
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771181258959167715E6A45A7520FD65CB25777C6F59B7EEA4F36607C2244B327E35330A126CBD8ACE