Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 21:11:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE68A695312518DAD977704DFD8A09B5067AB3CDFE22F884914DDAA7D14FA607
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post factually indicates what the FT article claims and how it determined that, and discusses reactions to it. It can’t be expected to repeat every possible caveat and reservation about the claim. Criticisms of the FT’s methods and conclusions belong in replies. https://www.ft.com/content/98f15b60-bc4d-4d3c-9e57-cbdde122ac0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771181258959167715
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE68A695312518DAD977704DFD8A09B5067AB3CDFE22F884914DDAA7D14FA607
  • createdAtMillis - 1711141889594
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771181258959167715BE68A695312518DAD977704DFD8A09B5067AB3CDFE22F884914DDAA7D14FA607