Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 14:26:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03DCE96CD069F4925DBE3CD69F26AF7ED7E5A434B033945FCB7C27E16A99EB1F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post factually indicates what the FT article claims and how it determined that, and discusses reactions to it. It can’t be expected to repeat every possible caveat and reservation about the claim. Criticisms of the FT’s methods and conclusions belong in replies. https://www.ft.com/content/98f15b60-bc4d-4d3c-9e57-cbdde122ac0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771181258959167715
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03DCE96CD069F4925DBE3CD69F26AF7ED7E5A434B033945FCB7C27E16A99EB1F
  • createdAtMillis - 1711117584091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177118125895916771503DCE96CD069F4925DBE3CD69F26AF7ED7E5A434B033945FCB7C27E16A99EB1F