Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 16:49:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31EA42688FE6D0F0A1C4F591949310EB133A3BDAA915CBA832229B70A935B8B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence is provided to show that the claims in the FT article are fact FT cite the following as their source of information: "...according to three people familiar with the discussions." but there are no names and no comments Washington has not verified this claim https://www.ft.com/content/98f15b60-bc4d-4d3c-9e57-cbdde122ac0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771179059025973607
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31EA42688FE6D0F0A1C4F591949310EB133A3BDAA915CBA832229B70A935B8B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1711126155768
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177117905902597360731EA42688FE6D0F0A1C4F591949310EB133A3BDAA915CBA832229B70A935B8B3