Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 14:27:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC052DE1D6C39686B168EEB0DBB82A31449376DA821B0DB4563E038215964AFA
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence is provided to show that the claims in this article are a fact they cite the following as their source of information: "...according to three people familiar with the discussions." but there are no names and no comments Washington has not verified this claim https://www.ft.com/content/98f15b60-bc4d-4d3c-9e57-cbdde122ac0c

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771175979295334741
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC052DE1D6C39686B168EEB0DBB82A31449376DA821B0DB4563E038215964AFA
  • createdAtMillis - 1711117671004
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771175979295334741EC052DE1D6C39686B168EEB0DBB82A31449376DA821B0DB4563E038215964AFA