Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 13:09:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B2416C913931662153B367DCD19A979697B6B6250808C14EC33A449AEC5867D
Participant Details

Original Note:

A single critical article in the Daily Mail is not evidence of "widespread criticism"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771164398742024487
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B2416C913931662153B367DCD19A979697B6B6250808C14EC33A449AEC5867D
  • createdAtMillis - 1711199341651
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17711643987420244875B2416C913931662153B367DCD19A979697B6B6250808C14EC33A449AEC5867D