Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-23 12:35:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C962C2993361FACD26B6A8FE979CC198F4F46CCE8E7B839B029B2FBF4CC679B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

本件ツイートのリンク先の文章をよく読むと、研究不正に関与した研究者のランガ・ディアス氏とLK-99の研究者は直接の関係がないことが分かります。記事自体も意図的に混同させようという意図が見られ、誤解を招きかねないものです。 https://gadget.phileweb.com/post-72211/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1771022735390773566
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C962C2993361FACD26B6A8FE979CC198F4F46CCE8E7B839B029B2FBF4CC679B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1711197309223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1771022735390773566C962C2993361FACD26B6A8FE979CC198F4F46CCE8E7B839B029B2FBF4CC679B9