Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 09:37:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02C32BC07C1BC876C7D707CA9BE099F5E248B96FBB2E3FF489615B6D3E100E34
Participant Details

Original Note:

The New York Times’ information is correct, non-biased, and not propaganda. https://www.statista.com/statistics/239749/credibility-of-the-new-york-times-in-the-united-states/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770974894915715413
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02C32BC07C1BC876C7D707CA9BE099F5E248B96FBB2E3FF489615B6D3E100E34
  • createdAtMillis - 1712223431015
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177097489491571541302C32BC07C1BC876C7D707CA9BE099F5E248B96FBB2E3FF489615B6D3E100E34