Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 10:49:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E8E8C519F168DCCEED5CDFE2FF2576A91BA4325E18905E507763909278F2ECE4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Irreführend. Auf Antrag von Bürgerinitiativen hat der Conseil d'Etat nur entschieden, dass einzelne Verordnungen zur Bewertung der Lärmbelastung wegen Verfahrensfehlern ungültig seien. Es wurden keine Windräder gestoppt. Über Infraschall-Belastung wurde nicht geurteilt. https://environnementdurable.org/conseil-detat-annulation-historique-des-autorisations-eoliennes-impact-crucial-sur-lavenir-energetique-francais/ https://environnementdurable.org/documents/CE%208%20mars%202024.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1770933930172067910
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E8E8C519F168DCCEED5CDFE2FF2576A91BA4325E18905E507763909278F2ECE4
createdAtMillis - 1711104571763
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1770933930172067910E8E8C519F168DCCEED5CDFE2FF2576A91BA4325E18905E507763909278F2ECE4