Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 11:37:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C667487E7744800B27485C6331B5361CFF983897F85FA9B7C49EC56297589239
Participant Details

Original Note:

Irreführend. Auf Antrag von Bürgerinitiativen hat der Conseil d'Etat nur entschieden, dass einzelne Verordnungen zur Bewertung der Lärmbelastung wegen Verfahrensfehlern ungültig seien. Es wurden keine Windräder gestoppt. Über Infraschall-Belastung wurde nicht geurteilt. https://environnementdurable.org/conseil-detat-annulation-historique-des-autorisations-eoliennes-impact-crucial-sur-lavenir-energetique-francais/ https://environnementdurable.org/documents/CE%208%20mars%202024.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770933930172067910
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C667487E7744800B27485C6331B5361CFF983897F85FA9B7C49EC56297589239
  • createdAtMillis - 1711107475995
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770933930172067910C667487E7744800B27485C6331B5361CFF983897F85FA9B7C49EC56297589239