Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 03:40:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 989E7636C637E27F45A0E3BCCCBFF0D12B75881CBBC1EDB91009230DE3FDEDD6
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time this tweet was written, there was no prohibition against naming anonymous users. X staff have been pretending that the rule was always there but it is clearly absent from all archived copies of the site, even the one taken hours after this tweet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320090939/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1770826272064614496
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 989E7636C637E27F45A0E3BCCCBFF0D12B75881CBBC1EDB91009230DE3FDEDD6
createdAtMillis - 1711078806372
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1770826272064614496989E7636C637E27F45A0E3BCCCBFF0D12B75881CBBC1EDB91009230DE3FDEDD6