Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 14:21:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85701247CB5DCDA88B26AA4C087B74C3ABE9CBAD2DFC23EE5C0EA6AB8F4B98D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time this tweet was written, there was no prohibition against naming anonymous users. X staff have been pretending that the rule was always there but it is clearly absent from all archived copies of the site, even the one taken hours after this tweet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320090939/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1770826272064614496
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 85701247CB5DCDA88B26AA4C087B74C3ABE9CBAD2DFC23EE5C0EA6AB8F4B98D5
createdAtMillis - 1711117303932
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 177082627206461449685701247CB5DCDA88B26AA4C087B74C3ABE9CBAD2DFC23EE5C0EA6AB8F4B98D5