Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 18:23:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time this tweet was written, there was no prohibition against naming anonymous users. X staff have been pretending that the rule was always there but it is clearly absent from all archived copies of the site, even the one taken hours after this tweet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320090939/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1770826272064614496
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E
createdAtMillis - 1711131798154
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17708262720646144964687D65F57204705E25FF04521F98E8925C5F9B9B5B50D47BAFF4EDA033A0C9E