Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-22 02:13:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22F86BE1FD9DDDA2EBF9EEDBD3775CF8DF39CA3CC8D006763DADEE6724FDE83B
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time this tweet was written, there was no prohibition against naming anonymous users. X staff have been pretending that the rule was always there but it is clearly absent from all archived copies of the site, even the one taken hours after this tweet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320090939/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1770826272064614496
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 22F86BE1FD9DDDA2EBF9EEDBD3775CF8DF39CA3CC8D006763DADEE6724FDE83B
createdAtMillis - 1711073607465
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 177082627206461449622F86BE1FD9DDDA2EBF9EEDBD3775CF8DF39CA3CC8D006763DADEE6724FDE83B