Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 22:51:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01EF2396CD96F8C53D44680385ED29411A0E2FDA97189BCB95F2C55008CE6E8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time this tweet was written, there was no prohibition against naming anonymous users. X staff have been pretending that the rule was always there but it is clearly absent from all archived copies of the site, even the one taken hours after this tweet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320090939/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770826272064614496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01EF2396CD96F8C53D44680385ED29411A0E2FDA97189BCB95F2C55008CE6E8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1711061518300
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177082627206461449601EF2396CD96F8C53D44680385ED29411A0E2FDA97189BCB95F2C55008CE6E8C