Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 20:55:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29
Participant Details

Original Note:

At the time this tweet was written, there was no prohibition against naming anonymous users. X staff have been pretending that the rule was always there but it is clearly absent from all archived copies of the site, even the one taken hours after this tweet. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320090939/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770826272064614496
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29
  • createdAtMillis - 1711054505061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177082627206461449601EF1293564DD7054EE0CC2A51F142C412326635F49FE55B4BF572EE0B671A29