Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 07:43:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0DB4E2A9ADE1FD6B5E35295A6CF243BD68FB78FAF36A25EFE1C062FE94F1651
Participant Details

Original Note:

Bonjour https://www.euractiv.fr/section/energie-climat/news/environnement-les-bons-et-mauvais-eleves-du-parlement-europeen-selon-long-bloom/ Il est remarquable que le nucléaire ai tout simplement été ignoré par l'ONG bloom, ce qui est dommage, car au vu de l'impact carbone quasiment nul de celui-ci la totalité des graphiques fourni aurait été totalement différents.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770708030813819260
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0DB4E2A9ADE1FD6B5E35295A6CF243BD68FB78FAF36A25EFE1C062FE94F1651
  • createdAtMillis - 1711007012215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1770708030813819260A0DB4E2A9ADE1FD6B5E35295A6CF243BD68FB78FAF36A25EFE1C062FE94F1651