Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 06:02:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE526441873F146E61FF6D169A170B4B58C6652348F6C94082980874DB92E211
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The very rare single examples given in the note above in no way invalidate the point Dawkins is making regarding Fausto-Sterling's percentages. Stop using CN to try to make yourself look clever.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770573237295968718
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE526441873F146E61FF6D169A170B4B58C6652348F6C94082980874DB92E211
  • createdAtMillis - 1711000954780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770573237295968718CE526441873F146E61FF6D169A170B4B58C6652348F6C94082980874DB92E211