Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-29 22:03:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9532E48AB14CED92BC9D7E5215477D2380F660AD7CC5AD6F17126BA8E67B4B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Richard Dawkins is wrong when he says all X0 people are female and all XXY are male. Biology is more diverse than some can apparently acknowledge Here is an example of an XO male person: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/505597 Here is an example of an XXY female person: https://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)79762-2/abstract

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770500948336476567
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9532E48AB14CED92BC9D7E5215477D2380F660AD7CC5AD6F17126BA8E67B4B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1711749815818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1770500948336476567D9532E48AB14CED92BC9D7E5215477D2380F660AD7CC5AD6F17126BA8E67B4B0