Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-23 12:57:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB2A3ECB6C96CD91D24C1A7794EA465A4D20F727EF5CA73DA931813FFCAB7064
Participant Details

Original Note:

Richard Dawkins is wrong when he says all X0 people are female and all XXY are male. Biology is more diverse than some can apparently acknowledge Here is an example of an XO male person: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/505597 Here is an example of an XXY female person: https://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)79762-2/abstract

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770500948336476567
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB2A3ECB6C96CD91D24C1A7794EA465A4D20F727EF5CA73DA931813FFCAB7064
  • createdAtMillis - 1713877047763
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1770500948336476567CB2A3ECB6C96CD91D24C1A7794EA465A4D20F727EF5CA73DA931813FFCAB7064