Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-21 03:09:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640
Participant Details

Original Note:

Richard Dawkins is wrong when he says all X0 people are female and all XXY are male. Biology is more diverse than some can apparently acknowledge Here is an example of an XO male person: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/505597 Here is an example of an XXY female person: https://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)79762-2/abstract

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770495991965204554
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640
  • createdAtMillis - 1710990589969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177049599196520455480CF9AAD9C9BFEFDC633C2E03D1FDB88EA76A1EC51326AA8C302C9ED14DE3640